Tournaments, you either love them or hate them.
I have had a love hate relationship with tournaments for a
long time. That was until I started
running them and then I love them. In
the past, before I started to run events I was always the poor sap that came
nowhere, wasn’t recognised for my painting talent or was seen to be amongst the
in crowd. I wanted tournaments to be
more than what they had become, a dash for cash (prizes) with the whole concept
that what we do is play games forgotten on the whole. Games are
meant to be fun and enjoyable, not cut throat and unpleasant.
So here are my thoughts on tournaments, or to be more
precise how I run them.
PLACINGS
The placing of first, second, third etc. are nominal and
generally the norm. Depending on the
number of people I would get for an event, say 20 or more then this would be
acceptable. I also recognise the last
place holder, the unlucky or just bad gamer.
At the club I call home the last place position is highly sought after
and nothing to be ashamed of. After all
it’s all about having fun.
A trophy or award is all that should be given.
PRIZES
This is where I run into the most conflict with the
establishment. The people who play
competitively “demand compensation” for the effort they put into winning. My question is why? Is not the trophy or award and the plaudits
of your peers more than enough. Many
gaming companies now “reward” people who play in their events (as well as the
organisers) with benefits, either stock or discounts. This culture has led to a very mercenary
group of people who “farm” the circuit, making “money” out of their ability. People, and in particular new blood, will
stop attending and competing if the same people win over and over again. While it can be argued that competition
breeds a better state of play, our hobby is about enjoyment, and that should be
first and foremost. Not a dash for cash.
In many events that I have run I have taken the bulk of the
prize support I have received and made it a random draw for all who have
attended (excluding the major place winners).
This way a new player can feel good with themselves having an equal
chance to win a prize than having to worry about being able to best the
champion. This means that while games
are competitive, they are not cut throat and I would hope not unpleasant.
MULTIPLE AWARDS
This is not on.
There
are indeed some talented people out there but my philosophy is one person one
award. For instance a person who obtained
the highest points for first place and
best painted and sportsmanship should not get all three awards. They get the highest choice. I’d rate the order as place, painting and
then sportsmanship.
EVENT ORGANISERS
They should not be running events purely for their own
benefit. A number of companies offer
support to organisers in a number of forms.
While some people see this as a way to obtain items hard to obtain, I
think that anything obtained in this manner should be given as a prize in any
event. Otherwise organisers are
essentially prostituting themselves for benefits that many others cannot obtain
through fair play. You should be running
events for the love of the hobby, not for the love of what you can get out of
it.
I run events because I am an extremely capable
administrator. I can easily craft
spreadsheets to calculate places and scores.
I get more enjoyment out of seeing other having fun than being one who
participates in the event. My
satisfaction comes from knowing that people walk away from my event happy and
keen to attend the next one. My
reputation speaks for itself.
FINAL WORDS
In the end I am just the abnormal person who desperately
hangs on to outdated modes of conduct. I
am (un)landed gentry and a true gentleman in all aspects of its connotation. However
I have always endeavoured to be above board in all the events I have run. People play in my events because they know
they can have fun and have an equal chance of walking away with something that
makes their attendance all worthwhile.